Left-wing Activist Says Race Attacks on Tea Party Are Bogus But Effective
I am not sure what a Tea Party person is. I don’t know if I am one. I’ve never been to a Tea Party rally, but from what I’ve seen, I can sure support their right to assemble. I know I am not a Democrat, and I am pretty sure the word Republican doesn’t represent me either. I guess I am an Independent. It’s hard to find anyone in Washington D.C. that represents me.
With that said, the Tea Party rallies seem to be gaining the interest of many, and I think the Left are afraid of them. Instead of flashing brilliance to respond to Tea Partiers, they come up with bogus claims of racism, they’ve got nothing better than that.
And now one of the left’s leaders admit it.
Mary Francis Berry
From NewsBusters: What will it take for the media to acknowledge that the Tea Party is not a racist movement, and that liberals have smeared it as such in a naked politicization of race relations? How about a lefty activist admitting just that.
UPenn professor Mary Frances Berry, a leader of the “far-left black political scene,” as NB Executive Editor Matt Sheffield wrote, penned this astonishing email to Politico, published on July 20:
Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.
The strategy is, of course, reprehensible, but members of the Tea Party movement have long suspected that accusations of racism were nothing more than elements of a political ploy motivated by a fear that the movement’s influence could spell disaster for Democrats in November and beyond.
Rather than discuss the issues, these smear artists allege racism since it immediately puts political opponents on the defensive, preventing them from pushing lines of argument to which most Americans are sympathetic.
That Berry specifically mentioned joblessness as an issue that can be dodged by crying racism demonstrates just how desperate liberals are to avoid discussing the still-sagging economy. It’s a losing issue for Democrats, and their supporters know it. By dubbing the critics of Democratic economic policy racists, they can avoid discussion of the failures of their own policies.
Coverage of this outrageous statement from the mainstream media: practically zero. Hannity has mentioned it a couple times, and Politico, of course, has acknowledged it.
But almost every other major news outlet – ABC, NBC, MSNBC, HLN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, Newsweek, Time – has completely ignored the statement, according to a Nexis search. The Wall Street Journal’s John Fund mentioned it on CBS’s Face the Nation and on CNN Newsroom, but neither outlet covered the topic on its own, or followed up on Fund’s statements. Mary Matalin mentioned it on the Situation Room, but once again, it took a conservative guest for the statement to even be acknowledged, and no one followed up.
Why does the news ignore news? Why do they promote lies?
